Thread
:
Dipoles, why height matters
View Single Post
#
44
November 23rd 14, 01:43 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jerry Stuckle
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
Dipoles, why height matters
On 11/22/2014 7:21 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
snip
Once again you refuse to discuss the topic. Instead of admitting you
are wrong, you are making ad hominim attacks. How like a troll.
You have changed the topic so many times now I lose track.
First it was the effects of antenna height in wavelengths.
Then it was something about you not liking my response to someone who
said their antenna sucked.
I called your statement into question because you said any 80 meter
antenna under 100' (a little over 1/4 wavelength) sucked.
Then it was something about you having a WAS thus proving your antenna
was wonderful.
Yes, I proved you were wrong with your statement about wavelengths.
Then it was something about 80M and 6M being different when I said that
signal reports do not measure antenna gain or pattern.
You're the one who brought up 6M, not me.
Which topic do you want?
I haven't changed the topic at all. But you have tried to do so -
several times.
Just like the troll you are - keep trying to change the topic, but when
someone calls you on it, you blame them. It's not going to work, though.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
==================
Reply With Quote
Jerry Stuckle
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Jerry Stuckle