RadioBanter - View Single Post

Jerry Stuckle · November 23rd 14, 03:33 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna

On 11/22/2014 11:10 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 9:12 PM, wrote:

snip

Which question was that, why QSL cards or awards are irrelevant as a
measure of antenna performance like you keep trying to claim?

It is proof that my antenna worked

A light bulb will "work" as an antenna.

OK, let's see you get WAS on 80 meters with a light bulb.

That does not mean a light bulb is anywhere near an optimal antenna.

- even though it violates your
"chart".

No, it does not violate any chart, it just means you are in a rage that
someone implied something you used was less than perfect.

Sure it does. You said any 80 meter dipole under 100' "sucks". Then
you use the chart that you cut and pasted to prove it.

And it proves you can copy and paste - but you don't
understand what you're pasting.

I have asked you time and again what it is that you think the chart
shows but your only response to date has been to rage that I don't know
and you have a WAS.

I'm not going to waste my time - you'll just say I'm in a rage. You
have no idea what you're talking about.

And you seem to be hooked on saying I'm "in a rage". I guess you're
just trying to deflect your own feelings. Here's a clue - I'm not in a
rage over you or any other troll. You're not worth it.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================