Thread
:
Dipoles, why height matters
View Single Post
#
60
November 23rd 14, 08:54 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jerry Stuckle
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
Dipoles, why height matters
On 11/23/2014 12:59 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 11:04 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
snip
You don't get QSL's from all 50 states on 80 meters with an antenna that
"sucks". But you can't accept that fact because it violates your fantasies.
QSL cards say nothing about an antenna's performance, but you can't
accept the fact because you are in a rage that someone implied that
something you used was less than perfect.
You can't accept the fact that an antenna that "sucks" wouldn't be able
to get QSL cards from all 50 states on 80 meters.
Anything that conducts, from a light bulb to a set of bed springs can
act as an antenna and some contacts can be made; I've done it with
both.
Simply because something "works" says nothing about how well it works.
You are simply unable to accept the fact that something you had could
have worked better, thus you rant and fume and go off on tangents.
Where did I say something could not have worked better? Or are you
trying to put words in my mouth, again? That's what trolls do, after all.
All I said was your comment about an 80 meter dipole under 100' off the
ground sucks is wrong. And I supplied the proof for it.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
==================
Reply With Quote
Jerry Stuckle
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Jerry Stuckle