View Single Post
  #61   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 14, 08:55 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jerry Stuckle Jerry Stuckle is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
Default Dipoles, why height matters

On 11/23/2014 1:02 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 11:10 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 9:12 PM,
wrote:

snip

Which question was that, why QSL cards or awards are irrelevant as a
measure of antenna performance like you keep trying to claim?

It is proof that my antenna worked

A light bulb will "work" as an antenna.


OK, let's see you get WAS on 80 meters with a light bulb.


Anything that conducts, from a light bulb to a set of bed springs can
act as an antenna and some contacts can be made; I've done it with
both.

Simply because something "works" says nothing about how well it works.

You are simply unable to accept the fact that something you had could
have worked better, thus you rant and fume and go off on tangents.



Where did I say something could not have worked better? Or are you
trying to put words in my mouth, again? That's what trolls do, after all.

All I said was your comment about an 80 meter dipole under 100' off the
ground sucks is wrong. And I supplied the proof for it.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================