On 03/12/14 14:51, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/3/2014 4:23 AM, Spike wrote:
On 03/12/14 00:51, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/2/2014 6:20 PM, Spike wrote:

Are you an engineer or technician? You sound like one or the other.

Yes. And I have been for around 40 years.

Ah, now I understand.

The chap who is behind the RFD is the same chap who
brought 'order' to the US groups (and RRAM can be seen by all to be the
roaring success of this policy[1,2,3]), and the Charter and ModPol for
the proposed group being little more than a cut-and-paste job, even down
to the Americanisms.

[1] 61.7% blog posts

[2] Less than 1 post per day from individuals over 18 months

[3] The last gap between individual's posts was 4 days 2 hours.

TTFN

Which has absolutely nothing to do with ukram. They are two different
newsgroups, with two different audiences and two different moderation
teams. The only thing they have in common is the proposer of the RFD.

Plus the Charter and ModPol.

I don't expect you to see the Americanisms in there.

But that is immaterial since he has no say in the running of either
newsgroup, and anyone can create an RFD.

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has the antecedents of
a duck, it's a duck.

Either that or your grasping at straws to try to make your argument.
And it isn't working.

But you don't seem to be able to understand the difference between
apples and oranges.

Don't go shopping for poultry, or you may be very disappointed.

--
Spike

"Hard cases, it has frequently been observed, are apt to introduce bad
law". Judge Rolfe