View Single Post
  #60   Report Post  
Old February 25th 15, 11:42 AM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment
gareth gareth is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,382
Default Brian Reay's abusive blustering?

"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
After all, if they haven't understood say, super regeneration, after 40
years, what hope is there for their understanding, say, DSP?


Put your money where your (big) mouth is and explain to all why a
super-regenerative receiver will not resolve CW or SSB, when the
oscilation, although quenched, is effectively amplitude modulated
by the quenching?


For those who might have missed it, quoted above is reay's attempt
"to stir up trouble and create a row" by being the first to discuss DSP.

However, the point of my challenge above was to lay to rest (yet another???)
of reay's infantile sneers when it seems that he has no answer and is hoist
by
his own petard because he hasn't "understood say, super regeneration, after
40
years"

(And he has had more than enough time to google for the answer and get it
wrong, just as he did with the BC221 frequency meter)