"Stephen Thomas Cole" wrote in message
...
It all sprang from Gareth being corrected over one of his routine total
misunderstandings and he went off the deep end about it, as per, and
cooked
up "Big K", a Time Cube like confabulation and misrepresentation of known
physics. Some time later, after receiving much mocking, he declared that
he'd found some obscure textbook (AIUI, nobody has been able to verify the
contents of this supposed textbook, or even its existence) that proved
that
he was correct and that every other person on the planet was wrong and
always had been. Thereafter, he refused to be drawn further on "Big K",
saying that he had settled the matter "to [his] satisfaction".
There's little to be gained from reading Gareth's "Big K" theory, as it's
arm-waving nonsense of the highest order. I did challenge him last year to
produce a fully referenced paper on the subject that I could review and
assess, but he point-blank refused, of course.

Once again, your posts are a vehicle for infantile abuse, for, if you
had the slightest comprehension of the matters about which you sneer,
then you would have at least some credibility, but you merely add
weight to the adage that empty vessels make the most noise.

For example, in the above, you make no discussion of the technical
matters involved and try to mask your ignorance by tirades of abuse.

You also lie, for I made no such point-blank refusal., and your continual
whingeing on about a peer-reviewed paper was your device for masking
your ignorance, for when I enquired of you which bits of my theory
that you found fault with, you shuddered to a hallt with your tail between
your legs shouting out childish remarks as you ran (pretty much as
you do above)

Now, Stevie, baby, now that you have widened the circulation to comp.dsp,
why not phrase the exact technical issue with which you found difficulty?

Perhaps you could start off by explaining the correction to which you allude
at the beginning of your rant, above, just to show that you have the merest
inkling
of the matter, to sace face?