View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Old March 8th 15, 10:56 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Spike[_3_] Spike[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 180
Default E/M radiation from a short vertical aerial

On 08/03/15 09:33, Jeff wrote:
Spike wrote


I think you are coming at this from the wrong view point.


Perhaps the question that you should be asking is what take-off angles
are required to produce maximum ground wave, and how do you maximize
that for a MF mobile installation.


I'm really after figures for the proportions of the RF power fed to that
antenna, that finish up in whatever 'they' are called (the use of the
well-known word 'waves' seem to upset people despite their having been
used for the specifics I mentioned, for about 100 years).

I'm aware that reconfiguring the set-up might affect these proportions,
but I did refer the original query to a typical /M (mobile) set-up of a
short rod antenna not connected to ground and operating over average
conductivity in the MF/low-HF bands.

For example, does 40% power the sky (redacted), another 40% power the
space (redacted), and the other 20% power the surface (redacted)?
Clearly, 100% of the RF power goes somewhere, and the various parts of
it must add up to 100% - so what are the proportions?

If the /M (mobile) set-up was changed to a /P (portable) one with a 5/8
lambda ground-mounted antenna, the sky (redacted) proportion would lower
and the surface/space (redacted) would increase - but from what to what?

I'm beginning to think that this topic is either so simple or so complex
that most Amateurs have either forgotten it or have never heard of it.

--
Spike

"Hard cases, it has frequently been observed, are apt to introduce bad
law". Judge Rolfe