View Single Post
  #192   Report Post  
Old July 7th 15, 04:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
John S John S is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2011
Posts: 550
Default An antenna question--43 ft vertical

On 7/7/2015 10:14 AM, Wayne wrote:


"John S" wrote in message ...

On 7/5/2015 7:08 PM, Wayne wrote:


"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...

On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:22:19 +0100, Brian Reay wrote:


As for a simpler way, I'd recommend a remote auto-matcher like an
SGC at
the antenna base. It will minimise coax losses and should give you a
good match, at least for most bands. I've used a similar set up (with
radials) and achieved a good match even on 80m.

If your radio has a built in tuner, then it can be used to 'tweak' the
match in the event the radio isn't 'seeing' 1.5:1. Turn it off
initially. Let the SGC find a match. If it isn't ideal, use the local
ATU for a final tweak. I never found this was required but YMMV.


Not everyone is a true believer in antenna tuners:
http://www.qsl.net/g3tso/Hombrew-Mobile%20Antennas.html



Interesting.
I'm off on a different approach.

I have an RF ammeter mounted in a box. The box is in the shack between
the ATU and the antenna.

I simply adjust the ATU for max current on the ammeter.


Hey, Wayne -

As a matter of curiosity on my part, can you find a way to measure the
ammeter's resistance and let me know the full-scale value?

No, I don't have enough test equipment to easily do that.

With a DVM it measures 0.4 ohms and with a VOM measures 28 ohms. And
the VOM gives no needle movement.

It is a O. D. McClintock Signal Corp typs I S-III with full scale of 2.5
amps.
Since it was salvaged from some WW II equipment back in the 1950s, it
probably isn't calibrated.

But, it gives a useable relative reading.


Many thanks for the info. The reason I asked was that I thought it might
be possible to build one. I need a starting point.

Again, thanks.