View Single Post
  #301   Report Post  
Old July 9th 15, 08:42 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected] jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default An antenna question--43 ft vertical

John S wrote:
On 7/9/2015 12:40 PM, wrote:
Jeff wrote:
On 08/07/2015 19:14,
wrote:
John S wrote:
On 7/7/2015 1:44 PM,
wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Jerry Stuckle
writes


Sure, there is ALWAYS VSWR. It may be 1:1, but it's always there.

If there's no reflection, there can be no standing wave. So, being
pedantic, there's no such thing as an SWR of 1:1!

Despite the name, VSWR is defined in terms of complex impedances
and wavelengths, not "waves" of any kind.



Actually, VSWR is defined as the ratio of Vmax/Vmin.

Actually, VSWR can be defined several ways, one of which is:

(1 + |r|)/(1 - |r|)

Where r is the reflection coefficient which can be defined a:

(Zl - Zo)/(Zl + Zo)

Where Zl is the complex load impedance and Zo is the complex source
impedance.

Note that a complex impedance has a frequency dependant part.



Note the the definition of VSWR uses the magnitude of the reflection
coefficient, |r|, which removes the phase and frequency dependant parts.

Jeff


The magnitude DEPENDS on the frequency dependant parts.


But the ratio of Vmax/Vmin does not.


So what?

P=E^2/R; does that mean current is irrelevant to power?

There is no one, true, written in stone, official and holy definition
of SWR.

All the definitions are equally valid.



--
Jim Pennino