On 9/6/2015 8:52 AM, George Cornelius wrote:
In article , Jerry Stuckle writes:
This is one reason why ionization detectors are not recommended any more
- too many false alarms. That, plus photoelectric detectors are much
faster at detecting real fires.

And to avoid everyone just repeating whomever their favorite
pontificator is, let's inject something a bit more authoritative.

Courtesy Wikipedia:


snip rest of crap

You really cite Wikipedia as a trusted source? ROFLMAO!

Try a real source - like reports from NFPA, independent laboratory
tests, etc. Then maybe you can have some respectability - which you do
not have now.


George


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================