View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Old September 11th 15, 10:48 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
rickman rickman is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 989
Default Furthe questions to the RF Photonists amongst you.

On 9/11/2015 1:45 PM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message
...
On 9/11/2015 1:19 PM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message
...
On 9/11/2015 6:50 AM, gareth wrote:
"gareth" wrote in message
...
3. Also, if your RF photons are generated by that same intra-atomic
process, then
what must be the laser / maser like process that induces all the atoms
in
a half-wave dipole
to produce the photons in the appropriate phase relationship?
IN particular this question because of the unpredictable statistical
nature
of quantum physics, and the dipole radiaition is completely regular and
predictable.
Statistical does not mean "unpredictable". The oceans are full of
individual molecules of water, each moving in a seemingly random manner
from thermal perturbations. But in aggregate they exhibit complex and
beautiful movement of waves breaking on a jetty just as mandated by
quantum mechanics.

So, what is the aggregate mechanism in your dipole that has your RF
photons
all
actin in synchronicity?


Where does the "synchronicity" requirement come from? Antenna are not
lasers.


A nice wave emanates from the dipole, and not a collection of wavelets of
random phase,
and yet individual quantum events seem to be unpredictable


Quanta are not wavelets. If you understood QM theory you would realize
the two ways of viewing EM waves are not contradictory. Rather they are
two different ways of viewing the same phenomena. The *exact* same
light emitted by a device will show particle or wave like properties
without any difference in how the energy is generated. The only
difference is in how it is viewed.

--

Rick