Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:

Roger Hayter wrote:
Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:

wrote:
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:52:44 PM UTC-5, Wayne wrote:

As I understand Gareth's assertion, at every position on the point
source sphere, the field strength would be lower than for a bigger
antenna replacing the point source. I doubt that is true.

He's trying to blame the poor old radiator, "free space", or the "Aether"
for rig to feed line to radiator matching losses.

My reason to even join this circus is to bring to his attention that
his opening statement is totally false.

The Lumeniferous Aether... The story of Art Unwin's long lost cousin.

chortle..

It seems quite evident that Gareth's mental state has recently deteriorated
even further than its usual squalid depths.

Have you nothing to say on the subject of aerials? You could at least
correct the spelling of "luminiferous" if you have nothing else useful
to say.

What's to say? Gareth has poured a bucket of faeces into the group, there's
precisely zero useful conversation to have with the gibbering idiot on the
subject of antennas.

So why waste our time by pointing out what a bad boy he is? Do you
want our approval or something? FWIW, I think Gareth probably does
think he is talking sense, which makes it courter-productive to just
abuse him without addressing the issues.

--
Roger Hayter