Thread: Parallel coax
View Single Post
  #26   Report Post  
Old September 28th 15, 05:05 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
John S John S is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2011
Posts: 550
Default Parallel coax

On 9/28/2015 10:47 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , rickman writes



Definition of Return Loss

In technical terms, RL is the ratio of the light reflected back from a
device under test, Pout, to the light launched into that device, Pin,
usually expressed as a negative number in dB.

RL = 10 log10(Pout/Pin)

Here is a link for a table of return loss and VSWR....

http://www.jampro.com/uploads/tech_d.../VSWRChart.pdf

It shows a higher return loss (assuming you mean magnitude since the
values are all negative) for lower VSWR.

I'm surprised to see negative quantities. For 50 years, I've always
understood the Return Loss Ratio (RLR) to be exactly what it says on the
tin, ie the ratio (in dB) of the LOSS (the attenuation) of the reflected
signal wrt the incident signal. This is a +ve quantity. Things are
already sufficiently confusing without having to start thinking in
unnecessary -ve figures!



I think you are correct. I think the confusion is the word *loss*. If
you have a positive *loss* number, the return signal is reduced. To have
a negative return loss number, you need to refer to *gain*.

For example, a return *loss* of 20dB is the same as a return *gain* of
-20dB.