On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:09:51 -0500, rickman wrote:

But you don't really know the details of how it works, so you don't know
how well it can work other than by building it and testing.

I can get a clue on how well it works from an NEC2 model. However,
this loop is easy. Remember your complaints about the relative merits
of a circular loop, octagonal loop, square, and triangular loop? Well,
this contrivance is a good example of a very shrunken loop, where the
area enclosed by the loop has been minimized.

Anyway, I'm a big fan of building something just to see what happens.
It's part of "Learn by Destroying".

I haven't
seen any reports that can be considered rigorous, but there is plenty of
enthusiasm by the users. They think these antennas work well.

Yep. I also read the reviews on various products and usually find a
few fanatics that will defend inferior junk to the death. It happens.
However, I'm not talking about "these" antennas as in all types of
loop antennas. I'm talking about this particular loop:
http://www.mixw.co.uk/MagLoop/magloopF.htm

My ego is too inflated to fit into the loop. I'll stick with the
traditional colander on the head arrangement:
https://www.google.com/search?q=colander+on+head&tbm=isch

Are you making fun of religion now?

I'm Jewish and occasionally wear a yarmulke (keepah or skull cap)
which entitles me to some liberties in their design and operation.
Full disclosu Mine is not lined with tin foil.

Argh... I'm late again.

Someday you'll be late for the last time and everyone will call you "late".

Actually, I try to always be on time or a little early. In this case,
it was for a ritual morning exercise trudge through the local state
park. We usually have a small group that I didn't want to keep
waiting.


--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558