May 22nd 16, 08:43 AM
posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2014
Posts: 329
|
|
When did ignorance overcome education, for the correctplural is, "antennae"?
Brian Reay wrote:
Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Spike wrote:
On 21/05/2016 11:20, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Jeff writes
Well my UK 1956 Collins Dictionary says for 'antenna' noun...
(Wireless)...plural antennas.
So antennas was certainly accepted as correct in the UK in 1956.
Jeff
In the UK, I think it's only some of the more-esoteric scientific
research boffins in WW2 who would have used 'antenna' and 'antennae'.
When R V Jones wrote his report on the Luftwaffe's X-Gerate navigation
and bombing system, he included a photograph of a Heinkel 111 annotated
with arrows pointing to the three aerials of the system, which he had
labelled 'X-Beam antennae'.
[uk.radio.amateur added]
Yes, I think it has more to do wtth the kind of education one has had
(in school, or self-selected), than to with with being 'esoteric' or a
'boffin'. In fact, the very term 'boffin' is rarely heard except when
used by the wilfully ignorant (those who think football is important for
instance) about people who seem cleverer than themselves.
I can honestly say that the only people I have ever heard use the word
"boffin" are tabloid newspaper journalists, usually in stories about
cloning sheep or GM food.
And now you. Congratulations!
You need to watch some old War films, the kind Spike watches back to back
and before his metamorphosis into a pseudo Dr Kelly, used to model his life
history on.
I'll give that a pass, thanks.
--
STC / M0TEY /
http://twitter.com/ukradioamateur
|