"Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message
news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02...
Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like
that.

Oh, now, you're just reaching on that one. You could use that line of
thinking
to support ANYTHING. The fact is, one of the strongest and loudest responses
you hear from the PCTA group is that it is suppose to filter OUT people like
that;
given that this is just but SOME proof that it doesn't, thier argument
fails. Not
only that, it's on record that the majority of rules violaters ARE hams with
morse code endorsement... yet MORE evidence to prove that morse code
testing does not filter out the "yahoos".


You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it.

Any anything else that is required to learn that has no real factual
reasoning or basis and is a total waste of time.

This is
what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or
don't join our ranks!


....until the FCC says that it is no LONGER what it takes to be a ham.
THEN, a person can become one without the morse code testing.

Clint
KB5ZHT