View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old June 29th 16, 04:29 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
rickman rickman is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 989
Default Scope of the term "Amateur"

On 6/29/2016 10:59 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:41:21 -0400, rickman wrote:

The term "amateur" is often applied to people who have obtained a
license to use radio equipment for communications. Is this term
inclusive of those who don't obtain a license but use receivers for
various uses?


I believe the term was used to describe anyone that indulges in RF but
does NOT charge for their efforts. The FCC wanted to distinguish
between commerical (for profit) services, and amateur (not for profit)
services.

For reception only, the term was "SWL" or short wave listener. I
guess that also applies to only listening on just about any frequency
from ELF to satellite communications.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortwave_listening
No license required to just listen.

I have been looking into design of receivers in the LF to ELF frequency
ranges. Is this part of "amateur" radio?


Mostly yet. However, some bands do not require a license and operate
under FCC Part 15:
http://www.lwca.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LowFER
http://www.arrl.org/lf-low-frequency
https://hackaday.io/project/6882-lowfer-transmitter-for-your-arduino
etc...


Very interesting. I see a difference between the ARRL article and the
Hackaday page. ARRL says the power limit on the US 1750 meter "free
band" is 1 W into the "transmitter's final stage" while the Hackaday
page says the limit is 1 W into the "feedline" and antenna system.

--

Rick C