Reg: 
 
[snip] 
 For calculating convenience, we assume the radiation resistance, Rrad, is 
 uniformly distributed along the length of the wire and is 140 ohms which 
has 
 been calculated from its dimensions.  It only has two  - Length and 
 Diameter.  But for a half-wave dipole it is always about 140 ohms.  Wire 
 diameter has a relatively small effect on Rrad. 
[snip] 
 
Reg, in your model, is your *assumption* "for calculating convenience" that 
radiation 
resistance is uniformly distributed along the antenna structure, i.e. the 
transmission line 
that represents the antenna in your model, supported by any theory or is it 
just a 
mathematical *fit* to the data? 
 
For example, one could *assume* literally any analytic distribution of 
radiation resistance 
along an antenna's length, for instance sinusoidal, catenary, exponential, 
triangular, etc... 
and come up with a value/function for that particular distribution that has 
the equivalent 
effect of a lumped value placed at the antenna feedpoint.  What is so unique 
about uniform? 
 
Why do you think *uniform* is any better than any other distribution of 
Rrad? 
 
I have no axe to grind here, just curiosity... 
 
Best Regards for the New Year. 
 
-- 
Peter K1PO 
Indialantic By-the-Sea, FL. 
 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |