On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:14:14 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 5:00 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 4:52:55 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 4:27 PM, wrote:

Thanks for showing your cyberbully core, to the future, Jim. This person is 72 year old Jim Pennino , ARS callsign (2017) WB6DKH. You can trace his history of statements.

Jim is clearly a jerk and only here for the drama, but I don't think you
can say you are not participating by replying to every stupid post he
makes to you.

You have the ability to just ignore him you know.

--

Rick C

Obviously I have articulated my motivation yesterday

Yes, you said "No. Ignoring such comments in the age of eternal
archiving doesn't work. Its CYBERBULLYING. I am a very sane person with
resources behind me. I am in a position to stop it. "

But so far I have only seen a bunch of irrational posts in reply to the
ignorant posts of others.

Your continued replies to stupid posts only serves to make you look
worse. At this point I think you are as bad as Jim and only here for
the drama. Certainly you aren't doing any good for fractal antennas.

--

Rick C

Pleasure to hear from you again, Rick.

Both fractal antennas, and I, are doing very well, thank you!:-)

I did fractal antennas a big favor (since you insist in anthropomorphizing them)by debunking a nonsense set of claims. I thought you might enjoy this video and how skepticism thus works with science to vanquish silly claims--in this case that fractal antennas don't work as well or better.

Enjoy my friend!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK9MgKck0z0&t=2s

Best,
Nathan Cohen