RadioBanter - View Single Post

[email protected] · April 26th 17, 11:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna

On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 7:52:12 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/25/2017 7:05 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 6, 2000 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, Fractenna wrote:
FWIW, consider this my last word on the subject of your safety and
well-being. From now on, I will assert my 1st Amendment right to be
brilliant, funny, serious, or dumber-than-nine-chickens. Selah.

73, Corry K4DOH

Thanks for your comments Corry;

I can see that you are sincere and being helpful and I am genuinely grateful
for your advice.

However--

Society does not stop on the NG. It is subject to the same rules and points of
law that we are subject to elsewhere.

I have no concern about 'dumb' comments, or anything else of that ilk. I DO
have concerns about the harassment , slander; defamation; and libel that has
occurred--with me made as the target-- and the latest era of genuinely
danger--motivated threats.

I disagree with you, respectfully. There is no reason why we should ACCEPT
such poor behavior when it is meant to harm.

I don't know what you mean by 'troll'. If, by this, you mean that I have been
dedicated to dissemnation of information, you are most certainly correct. But
its YOU--as a thinking and curious person--who makes that decision for him or
her self. I am by no means offended if fractal antennas aren't your cup of tea.

Whether or not you build a fractal antenna is up to you. I certainly do not
feel you should do so because I 'want' you to. You should do it because Corry
'wants' to.

Best 73,
Chip N1IR

This response proves as pertinent today as the day it was said.

Is this guy another Gareth? I haven't seen him post anything that
wasn't about the crap in the newsgroup rather than anything on topic.
At this point his posts complaining about the crap in the group have
become part of the crap in the group.

Apparently without posting anything in a *long* time, he was resurrected
by a single mention of his first name. Wow! Beetlejuice has nothing on
him. I'm not sure Gareth does either.

--

Rick C

Hello Rick,

I do not know who this 'Gareth' is. Should I? You make it sound like I am supposed to regard him with disdain.

Before I inherit that opinion of Mr. Gareth,what, exactly is the factually verifiable transgression or transgressions this person allegedly inveighed against others?

Why is it pertinent or relevant to compare me to this 'Gareth'?

Is he a radio astronomer?

A Ph.D.?

An entrepreneur?

An inventor?

An antenna expert?

Please tell us how the two of us have commonalities.

Your friend,
Nathan Cohen