Jim, 
 
I don't know where you get this from. I just ran EZNEC on a 10 m vertical 
dipole with the following results: 
 
A) Bottom at 8 feet, gain at 5 degrees is -2.44 dbi. 
 
B) Bottom at 42 feet, gain at 5 degrees is +2.75 dbi. 
 
If you want to work locals, the greater height will also help to get clear 
local obstructions, like small hills 
 
Tam/WB2TT 
"Jim Leder"  wrote in message 
... 
 But, don't get it up to high. EZNEC shows that when the bottom end is a 
half 
 wave length above ground, the TOA goes up over 40 with not much 
improvement 
 in gain. The vertical half wave dipole seems to be at it's best a quarter 
 wave above ground (meaning the bottom end is only 8 feet up on 10). So, 
the 
 top insulator should be up about 24-25 feet. When installed at this 
height, 
 the TOA is below 20 and the gain is almost the same as the higher version, 
 roughly 1.4dbi. The antenna does not require radials. 
 
 
 "Keyboard In The Wilderness"  wrote in message 
 news:PCzLb.55730$m83.35174@fed1read01... 
   the vertical dipole and radials 
  
  Just picture a 1/2 dipole horizontally  -- then rotate it 90 degrees (or 
  stand it on end)  -- same antenna -- different polarization. 
  
  So this picture should clarify why "No Radials". 
  
  The lower end is the other half of the dipole - it radiates in 
conjunction 
  with the upper half. 
  
  Others have advised you about the radiation from "Radials" 
  
  -- 
  73 From The Wilderness Keyboard 
  
  
 
 
 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |