LARDASS the mentally ill retard Davies "Dot Com" NoEmail@NoSpam
whined in message ...
"AB8MQ" wrote in message
...
LARDASS Lloyd Davies aka "Arf! Arf!"
blathered in message ...
"more lies

Here's the letter, dumb****, word for word, do see if you canb spot
the reason for the retest, beside the FCC perogative for doing so. And
note, too, that the retest was PASSED, and later the license was
upgraded. Something you haven't been able to do in over 10 years. You
couldn't pass the Technician license exam TODAY if you had to.

....................

Don't care what the letter did NOT contain..

Of course, you do, it makes your delusions that you think are real all
full of holes like Swiss cheese.

The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the rules to
readminister any examination element previously administered by a
volunteer examiner. ....Still stands, dumbass.

..HERE is the reason you were
made to retest and what Riley sent just prior to the retest notice.

November, 1999 to July, 2000 is more then "just prior to" fatty.
Several months. You forgot the cautionary letter that Riley sent
myself and the Gopher face, but then after I explained what Gopher
face had been doing on here and on the air, that is why he sent *that*
letter. Who do you think clued Riley into the disagreement in the
first place, dumbass?

Contrary to what you claim, I don't see anywhere in either letter where
Riley says a single word about a "random" retesting, as you lamely claim.

Anybody with more than your working two brain cells can, however. It's
even in the retest letter itself. No wonder you flunked out of those
public schools and just barely passed that christian school's courses.
But their standards are quite lower, after all. And, let's not for get
all you could manage at Kirkwood Community College is a "certificate".

"evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously
interfering with the
radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This
interference has occurred at various times in the last several months
and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions,"

Wrong again, that was part of the warning letter that "alledges"
interference.
Why do you think they put this disclaimer on their releases on the
ARRl web page?
NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.

Note that is says "evidence", Wussyman.

Too bad they left out the "manufactured" qualifier. "evidence" is
faked all the time, but if you weren't such a mentally ill retard who
lives in a fantyasy world of TimeLords and Daleks, you'd realize that.
The Letter states they have what they "believe to be reliable
evidence" doesn't necessarily make it so, your brain dead retard.

The letter doesn't say, "Things have
been a little bit slow for us here at the FCC, so to help fill our down
times we have instituted a new program of randomly retesting Amateur Radio
Operators."

No it says:
The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the rules to
readminister any examination element previously administered by a
volunteer examiner.

Which pretty much makes the "random" part quite true. Why do you think
there are so many in those many enforcement logs who have lost their
license because they didn't bother to show up for a retest? Read it
for yourself. Oh, sorry, I momentarily forgot whom I am addressing.
Get someone to read it for you and explain it to you.

The notice says, "evidence", which means YOU DID IT,

No, that was the "warning letter of Nov. 1999, that wasn't in the
retest letter at all. And it was still "allegations" of interference.
In fact it says:
NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.

and probably a whole lot more that you didn't get caught for.

You mean like when you play "Amazing Grace" on 20 meters?

And again, no, it just means they have faked tapes by Gopher face and
Davey boy trying to get somebody into trouble. Happens all the time,
just like it did to AC5IU. He got a warning letter for interference,
but they later recanted.

For crying out loud, Wiseman.

You seem to be doing more than your fair share of that, Lardass.

Your pathetic denials are really, really lame,
but that is to be expected of a congenital liar.

Too bad you had to plagiarize fatass high-el's words, huh Davies, you
sure couldn't come up with a word like "congenital" on your own.

--
The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the rules to
readminister any examination element previously administered by a
volunteer examiner.