To Matt the Pratt,

Simon, the only reason we "pillocks" take exception to these antics is that
they are dragging the "hooby" (sic) into the gutter.

Hey, Loser. Before you start slating my grammar, try looking at your
own [ Simon, the only reason *we* "pillocks] surely, your choice of
words should have been "us" and not "we"???.

By the sounds of your message, not only should you have used the word
"us" also you should have also replaced the word "pillocks" with
"****ing low-life dimwits"

I bet you read and re-read my post, trying to find any other spelling
mistakes that you could highlight and ridicule me with hey
"sissy-boy"???

I bet you are reading and re-reading this post, also trying to catch
another slip of my typing. Who do you think you are, my English
teacher, Sir?

It used to have
standards, both in technical expertise and behaviour. Your post only
exemplifies the lack of both.

Err, can you please explain that statement too?

Hhmmm, can you tell me how your post was "technical expertise and
behaviour" (whatever that is meant to mean) You are the **** that
didnt even offer any help to my initial message - and you didnt even
put in any stupid comments until now... Very "techinical expertise
behaviour" from you, and thankyou for your valuable help and comments.

My post started as one thing. A simple, polite question on the
newsgroups asking for help with some settings on a Mark 5. And all I
got back apart from one or two helpful replies, was a barrage of
pathetic comments.

And now one from you. You Sir, are obviously nothing that can be
explained better, than a "nincumpoop".