Richard Clark wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 03:52:11 -0600, Mark Keith wrote:
Boy, he finally got something right...Yes, accurate tests results can
tell a lot. *IF* we get ever get to see any.

Hi Mark,

His own data shows quite clearly that the eh antenna, 10 miles out, is
more than 30dB down from the nearby standard quarterwave it is
supposed to replace. His own data shows that at 1 mile out, the eh is
still underperforming.

Yea, But it should be even uglier if he does away with the tower and
feedline. Real ugly in fact.
I doubt we will see any tests done without a metal support, or radiating
feedline. "IE: the E/H antenna tested by itself, on it's own merits".
Or at least sponsored by that bunch. I wish I could remember who tried
it without the tower and feedline...Might be in google archives...It was
so ugly, it stunk up the place. MK
--
http://web.wt.net/~nm5k