View Single Post
  #61   Report Post  
Old July 6th 03, 02:51 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
"Dick Carroll;" writes:

wrote:

"Dick Carroll;" writes:

Wrong again, Bill. I define limited interest in ham radio as limited
interest in ham radio.

Where Ham Radio isn't Ham Radio if the CW testing requirement is
dropped. I approve of keeping the requirement, but I dispute your
right to define the ARS in terms like these.


Oh. So you don't believe that limited interest is actually limited
interest. I see.



You aren't that dense, so of course you're making this straw man on
purpose. You define "limited interest in CW" to be "limited interest
in ARS" because you define ARS as inherently including CW. Since
that's the topic under discussion, you are begging the question.


Where did Dick make that quote?

- Mike KB3EIA -