View Single Post
  #267   Report Post  
Old July 15th 03, 11:12 PM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Radio Amateur KC2HMZ" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 01:09:43 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:


Studying the propagation before, during, and after the contest indicated
that the best results would occur on CW.


If the deck was thus stacked against the SSB stations from the
beginning, then the results should come as no surprise. Nevertheless,
the phone stations did, in fact, still manage to make contacts.

The experience of our club bore
that out. Our SSB stations tried both tactics, i.e. camping on a

frequency
to run stations and hunting and pouncing. Productivity was quite low on
SSB. It picked up the second afternoon but was not good. Our CW

stations
also used both tactics and produced a high number of QSOs both ways
throughout the event.

I operated both SSB and CW modes for our club. Despite the fact that I

am
NOT an experienced CW contester and that my CW ability is rather weak,

even
I made far more contacts on CW even though I spent much more time on SSB.


Do you attribute this to band conditions or to something else?


No doubt about it, the band conditions were the determining factor.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE