"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , "Bill Sohl"
writes:
So convince the FCC that some august body of hams (elected? appointed?
approved by?) should take over setting FCC part 97 rules.
Works for me.
I believe that Bill's comment was tongue in cheek ... it won't fly, because
the FCC has a mandate and cannot abdicate its responsibilities.
Besides, if you think Congress suffers "gridlock" on contentious issues,
imagine how bad a body of hams would be ... worse than partisan politics,
for sure :-(
Carl - wk3c
|