Thread
:
Smells like type acceptance
View Single Post
#
34
July 19th 03, 03:37 AM
Dee D. Flint
Posts: n/a
"K0HB" wrote in message
m...
(N2EY) wrote
I agree with Carl 100% on this one.
I don't, and I don't agree with you either for that matter.
We all seem to agree that the guy ought to be nailed, and nailed HARD.
But under the heading of "unintended consequences", the notion of
requiring a ham to restore a radio to "factory spec" is first probably
outside the authority of the FCC. Even if it is within their
authority, it is a very troubling precedent to have lurking in
background. ARRL has gone to the mat with FCC on matters of far less
importance, but they seem to be looking the other way on this one.
73, Hans, K0HB
No, I don't think it is outside of the FCC's authority. They have the power
to modify the station license and operator license in just about anyway they
see fit.
Dee D. Flint, N8UZE
Reply With Quote