RadioBanter - View Single Post

July 21st 03, 07:37 AM

(Brian) wrote in message . com...

Merely because I think you grossly overreact to each and every post
Len makes?

I am sure you do, considering your nose is so far up his 6
o'clock orifice, I am sure you have to blow your nose every time he
passes wind.

You sure are a nice guy, Steve. What were you saying about having to
smite out the callous and crude? Next time you bolt on your Avenging
Angel wings, look for your own name on the list.

Again, I am sure you think so. But you forget the old addage
about "You reap what you sew".

Perhaps next time you decide to dive in with YOUR "witful
commentary" you'll contemplate the consequences before you run your
mouth off.

I won't hold my breath until you do, but you might...

Brain, there is noting "logical" about lying and callous
indiscretion that you and your buddy favor. Your other attempts to
twist what was clearly said in archived posts is likewise illogical.

No twisting. You just went off on a rant and forgot what the subject
was. Very easy to do when you lose self-control.

I went off on a rant? I hardly think so. Now YOU on the
other hand...

To you, perhaps. But then it seems it's just you and Lennie in
one corner and everyone else in the other. Even those who also favor
your basic views on Code testing do their best to distance themselves
from you and Lennie.

You might want to join them.

I already do. That's why I am rubbing YOUR nose in it and WE
are laughing about it.

Don't you wonder why?

No.

THAT was a rhetorical question, but the answer does not surprise
me. It's one of the few self-appreciating things you've done that was
accurate.

Do YOU think I am? Then I must be. Otherwise, I am just another
Amateur licensee who doesn't like some lookie-loo making irresponsible
and untruthful statements about something of which I have first hand
knowledge.

What was untruthful about the shuttle tragedy?

That you continue to try an make the tragedy's occurence itself
the center of discussion is yet more evidence of your unwillingness to
stand up to the truth. The topic was Lennie's blatant ugliness in
using it for some irrelevent newsgroup positioning.

There's nothing to be "diagnosed", Brain.

But there is. You're wacko for Len.

Nope. Lennie's wacko himself. That he continues to feed the NG
with fuel for his own demise is his problem. You are following in his
footsteps. Too closely I might add.

Other than my unwillingness to let go of Lennie's tail, no one
can argue with the validity of MY statements, nor can they deny the
arrogance and inaccuracies of Lennie's...And yours, for that matter.

I just did, and successfully, I might add. Unless you can come up
with some proof that the shuttle tragedy didn't occur, and that the
astronauts are safe and can renew their amateur licenses when they are
within the renewal period.

No...what you have done is try to make the tragedy itself the
center of discussion...It's not and never was. Lennie's blatant and
callous use of it for his own petty arguments was.

That you attempt to compound that act with his "defense" lumps
you in with him.

Whatever last vestiges of credibility you enjoyed prior to this
round has evaporated.

You've got your work cut out for you. Better get busy.

I think the "slapping around" that I take is from wacko's such as
yourself, and it would be forthcoming simply because I disagree with
you. Some, such as DICK and Kelly, range from merely curt replies to
rude name calling. You're off the scale.

I am sure you think I am.

I'm sure of it.

Then you are wrong again. Is being a loser a lifelong
accomplishjment for you, or is this a NEW development?

But then you also can't delineate the
difference between "authorization" and "acceptance", nor can you
validate any of the assertions you've made vis-a-vis your "credit" as
a "DX" operator.

I've operated DX from Korea, Guam, and Somalia. I didn't need your
approval, then or now.

Nope, you didn't. But you still don't understand the differences
as I stated above.

Many people here disagree with me, and I they...but the basic
fiber of the exchanges don't degrade to this point because we can
agree to disagree. You and Lennie can't/won't do that.

Then there's definitely something up between you and Len. You cannot
ignore even one of his postings. You've got to start a new thread
with almost every response, with eyes rolled back capitalization to
the hilt.

Not factual, as usual. Google refers.

Get a grip and get some help.

Get some facts before you post, Brain.

Brucie is in the killfile. Brucie is KNOWN to suffer various
mental abborations, and his rantings are so childish and idiotic that
they are clearly that to even the casual reader. He's an
idiot-bar-none, always was, always will be.

So put on your Avenging Angel wings and destroy him. You said that
you don't tolerate liars, the callous, and the crude. So get to work,
OR...

just ignore Len the way you are able to ignore Bruce.

An order from you, Brain?

And by the way, how is it that you can see "mental abberations" in
Bruce that you cannot recognize in yourself?

Well...let's see...there's Brucie's profanity, there's racism,
there's blatant threats of violence...etc etc etc.

That's off the top. Ya wanna start another thread on that one?

Lennie is all of that, and you "defend" him...So guess where that
leaves you?

So far, I haven't defended Len...(SNIP)

Sure you have. Read back the last 15 messages in this thread
alone.

This isn't about Len. This is about your insane behavior. You said
Len was a liar in a reply about the shuttle tragedy. You were wrong.

I said Len is a liar. That is not in dispute. I said he is
callous, insensitive, and a creep. That's not in dispute either.

YOU said I said he lied about the shuttle tragedy. That is a
lie. That you choose to further continue your attempts to cover up
your own foolishness and callousness is evident.

I merely said that you were wrong
about the shuttle tragedy. It really did occur.

Sure it did. But you have somehow insinuated that by having
identified Lennie as a liar I am saying he lies about this.

No insinuation. Go back and reread your post.

YOU go back an re-read it, Brain. But I'd suggest that you take a
class in English Comprehension first.

I did not.

Oh, but you did. You called him a liar.

He is a liar. YOU are trying to say that I said he lied about the
shuttle tragedy. YOU need to go back and get the order straight.

I said he's a callous, insensitive creep.

Yes, you did. But first you called him a liar. Its plainly there in
your post.

GET THE ORDER AND CONTEXT STRAIGHT, BRAIN!

This was but yet one
more a-burke-tion of what was said in order to create a fight in which
you fancy yourself as being on top.

Look, Steve. You crapped your pants. Just excuse yourself and go
clean up. Then put Len in your "kill file" as you've done with Bruce.
You'll feel a lot better afterward.

That odor you're detecting is from your realization that you have
once again stuck your foot in your mouth without first checking to see
where you feet had been.

I can't help you with that.

And I've suggested
that you refrain from reading Len's posts in the hope that you'll be
able to sleep at night.

I sleep fine, Brain. What would make you think otherwise?

Now you imply that I'm a rapist...

There YOU go trying to make an insinuation that just isn't true.

You're the one who said you couldn't decide what would be worse. When
pressed, you said "rapist...child molester...spouse abuser.."

Fine.

Look, go ahead and take your parting shot. I'm out of this thread,
but I reserve the right point out your poor behavior in your next new
thread.

As well you should be, Brain. You should have never enetered it
in the first place, ESPECIALLY since you seem to be unable to get the
order and context correct.

As for "parting shot(s)", I doubt this will be the last time we
tangle, Brain. You've consistently proven your wilingness to engage
in topics of conversation that you are either clearly unprepared for
and give little thought to the probable outcome when tasked to be
forthright or provide evidence of support for.

Auf Wiedersehn.

Steve