"Dee D. Flint" wrote:

(snip) If one looks at reality, only a very, very
limited handful of people came up with the technical
advances regardless of license class so it's probably
not a fair question anyway. Plus it would be skewed by
the fact that prior to the no-code tech license, all
hams had to have code. Neither side has a good argument
attempting to use this point to prove anything.


What you said above pretty much sums up my thoughts on this also.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/