"Dick Carroll;" wrote:
Floyd Davidson wrote:
DICK, you are not discussing the efficiency of a mode. What you
are arguing is the *operator's* ability to effectively use a mode.


Gasp! Floyd, are you *finally* beginning to understand what ham radio is all about????

DICK, I've known for decades that there are hams as dumb as you!

NO, Frostbite, what you've done is desmonstrate that you know virtually nothing
about anything except Shannon. I happen to ALSO know how it is with ham radio!

Yeah, we can tell!

There are *many* other things that can be controlled to change
the effective use of a communications channel. Your suggestion
*reduces* the channel capacity rather than making it more
effective.


FLOYD, FLOYD , FLOYD!!!!! One more time-----


**IN HAM RADIO WE VIRTUALLY ///NEVER/// NEED TO EMPLOY
MAXIMUM CHANNEL THROUGHPUT/DATA RATE!!!***

DICK, DICK, DICK, no **** DICK. Because Shannon says that
you *can't* use it.

Do tell. And you actuall suppose that I and by extension most other hams don't
know this?

If you know anything at all DICK, it is impossible to determine
so from the posts you make on Usenet.

You're nuts. AND have zero experience as a ham.

My experience as a ham is probably more than yours.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)