"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , Floyd Davidson
writes:

Floyd:

Please, enlighten us. Provide a definition of the term "empirical."

Your term was "Empirical Theory". Why don't *you* try to define
that in terms of "empirical" and "theory".

In theory at least, we should be able to empirically determine that
Larry is not theorist about empiricism, but rather an empiricist.


empiricist, n. -- a quack

Floyd:

I request meaningful participation in the debate, you respond with more
name calling.


Following your lead, no doubt.


If I made some sort of faux pas in the use of the term
"empirical theory," anyone interested in maintaining a useful discussion
of the issues would have simply corrected the error, and let it go.


Whine, whine, whine. You reap what you sow, Larry.


However,
it seems as though I've merely armed you with a straw to grasp, to be
utilized whenever you can't be bothered to continue to contribute
rational, logical arguments.


Pot/Kettle.


Since you've obviously abandoned the notion of reasoned
discourse, you automatically lose. You're out of your league here,
Floyd. Just like your colleague, Lennie.

73 de Larry, K3LT


Pah!! You gotta be kidding. You're out on a league of one, Larry. Save
for Dick, I see no one in your court. I, at least, see occasional posts in
good standing from nearly everyone...gosh, except for you and Dick...

Kim W5TIT