In article , Dave Heil
writes:
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil
writes:
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , "Carl R. Stevenson"
writes:
"N2EY" wrote in message
. com...
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message
...
"N2EY" wrote in message
...
What I wrote was precisely relevant.
Radio gods have the irritating habit of stating that only THEIR
viewpoints are "relevant." :-)
You wrote of someone's having not
been alive when something took place. I pointed out that you weren't
alive during some of the things which you've pontificated on in this
venue.
Now, now, Kolonel...you're busy trying to divert attention to someone
else by saying you are "relevant" and anyone disbelieving such a
godlike statement is "irrelevant."
You are worse than the other whiny PCTAs who want to "win" old
arguments that they LOST in here.
Try reading a BOOK on the REST of the world of radio instead of what
if spoon-fed you by the little publisher in Newington.
"YOU have NO authority to call anyone anything, demean them,
make fun of them, or anything else...yet YOU continue to do so.
That indicates the perversity of your control-freak psychosis."
--Leonard H. Anderson
...and you still don't have any of that authority, divine radio god.
What the hell are you prattling about?
...about a whiny radio god (yourself) getting all hot and bothered
by negative criticsm and not being able to argue any subject without
attempting misdirection into personalities.
Did you have a point?
Yes. But, like Reverend Jim, you can't accept it even though everyone
else (except fellow PCTAs) can see it for what it is. :-)
You certainly wrote a large number of diversionary words to cover your
gaffe. There was no boom of Japanese ham gear in the 1960's. Is it
clear now?
Again, you refuse to accept what was happening in the markets for
amateur radio equipment.
The Japanese companies were already IN the ham radio marketplace
in the USA then and they've occupied the prime position ever since.
Why no, Len, not as a school boy. I certainly have more governmental
communications experience during the cold war.
Any more tales of wondrous radio pioneering from the International
Cashew Nut exporting capital of the world? :-)
No doubt you were awarded an Intelligence Star for your James Bomb
duties getting the goods on nearby commies in other countries. :-)
It doesn't take a regulator to truthfully state that you weren't
involved and are not involved in amateur radio.
You mean NOT LICENSED. That's ALL you can claim. :-)
Keep up with that "charge," big radio god. It seems about the only
valid statement you can make.
Don't tell me what I am to amateur radio.
No problem. You do that constantly about yourself. :-)
I'm a licensed ham and have been for decades.
Which only proves that you've been able to renew that license
periodically and within the legal time. :-)
You should also describe the stamping on your hide from the FDA.
You, quite truthfully are not involved at all in amateur radio.
Well then, HAM RADIO magazine made some dreadful errors in
personnel, did it? :-)
You ought to bring up outright charges of fraud and misrepresentation.
Psycho pSteve does that periodically. Of course, he can't understand
any of the article's technical things so he just says they are "forgeries."
You aren't a judge of what hams do or have done.
Real hams sometimes contain unsafe amounts of Escherichia coli
O157:H7. Be careful of infecting others when spouting off in here.
You are not a regulator.
Neither are YOU, big radio god.
Now tell us, great big four-decade experienced AMATEUR radio god,
what have YOU ever done to "advance amateur radio?!?"
No, I don't believe I will, Len.
I don't believe you CAN. :-)
Show us your patents, your marvelous discoveries, all your
important technical contributions.
Still have your patent fetish?
Never had any "fetish." But, I DO have a patent in radio.
You've had FORTY YEARS of amateurism
and all you can come up with is trying to put down folks in an amateur
newsgroup?!?
Folks? Well, there's you.
You don't hesitate one bit to put down ANYONE who doesn't worship
your statements or ideals. That's clearly evident in this newsgroup
and available on Google.
Then again, you aren't a ham. You're just a groupie.
"Ham is the butchered meat of swine."
I'm just advocating the elimination of the morse code test for ANY
US radio license examination.
You've got it wrong, Len. I have a license and have had it for decades.
You get a nice gold star for renewing your license periodically.
Other than that, what can you claim?
I make contacts via amateur radio daily.
I make contacts with switches and relays. Break those contacts, too.
Daily. :-)
I'm a participant in amateur radio.
Well, that proves the radio god's "validity." One can't get IN amateur
radio without ALREADY being IN amateur radio. Know the morse code.
Worship morse code. It is the key to GREATNESS!
I don't issue catcalls from the sidelines.
You have a "license" to catcall from inside the lines?
Of course you do. "Authority" from the US government!
Your license grant "authorizes" you to be a horse's ass to anyone not
in league with your godlike opinions, statements, and general personal
insults.
No problem. Everyone sees that.
Get a better life.
I'm quite happy with this one, Len. Yours seems to be a little lacking
in light of your ham radio envy.
What "envy?"
I'm just advocating the elimination of the morse code test for radio
license examinations.
You seem to think that anyone doing that is committing some kind of
heresy or blasphemy.
You seem to think that ALL in this newsgroup MUST have a valid
amateur radio license to participate. You don't have any validity in
that demand so all you do is attempt individual personal insults.
You are still under the misconception that a valid amateur radio license
is required to participate in here.
This newsgroup isn't "ham radio." It is supposed to be about talking
policy matters for that. In the United States all us citizens have the
absolute RIGHT to free speech under our Constitution. You won't
accept that, thus you are acting unconstitutionally.
Radio gods are like that. Mere earthly laws don't apply to them.
LHA
|