"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"

writes:

Kim:

You're really out-doing yourself here. You've produced one
non-responsive,
irrelevant and un-enlightening response to each and every thing I've
posted
these last two days. You have truly perfected the art of wasting
bandwidth
on Usenet, not to mention your own time.

73 de Larry, K3LT


I haven't anything of substance to respond to, Larry. Produce some
literate, logical, intelligent form in your style and I will respond in
kind...

Kim W5TIT

Kim:

One hundred percent of my postings provide what you call "literate,
logical, and intelligent" arguments for you and others to respond to in
the same manner.


Now, Larry, if that were true, then we'd be having intelligent communication
rather than this blather. You are about as bright as a 2-watt light bulb.


Yet, you usually just toss dismissive one-liners,
or, just a simple "ROFLMAO." You have never demonstrated any
capability to produce "literate, logical, or intelligent" commentary in
this newsgroup whatsoever.


The reason you have missed it is because you are incapable of recognizing
anything intelligent, Larry. Like I said you're about as bright as a 2-watt
lightbulb.


And it's not just my postings which you
seem incapable of dealing with in an intelligent manner. You are
universally childish, immature, and just plain dumb in all of your
replies to each and every participant in this newsgroup -- and this
includes those with which you merely indicate agreement and call
it "participation."


You are not worthy to judge my posts, Larry. They are far superior to your
poor intellect.


You are so completely out of your intellectual depth that it is truly
a sad thing to witness on a daily basis. Have you no pride, woman?

73 de Larry, K3LT


Well, at least you can spell the word "intellectual." Now, could you start
practicing it? Go ahead, challenge me. I'd like to see something
intelligent from you for a change. When you do that, I will respond in
kind...

Kim W5TIT