"D. Stussy" wrote in message .org...
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Robert Casey wrote:
When it is known that a medical waiver wasn't used, it is (for pre April 19,
2000 extras).

Oh good! I got my extra on April 15, 2000 so I beat that deadline. :-)

NOT SO FAST: It was processed on April 18th, not the 15th. However, that is
still the day before the first "no-test" upgrades were processed, so we can
still tell that you have either a 20wpm extra or a waiver extra

Waiver Extra? This is the part where Dan Finn tackled me and said I
was making fun of disabled people. I wonder how he'll treat your use
of the phrase?

(based only on
the date - obviously more info needed to know which one of those). The first
"restructured" sessions on 4/15/2000 had results processed on April 19th.

Of course, your address change in December 2000 will obscure that fact for most
of the callbook users out there... but not me! ;-)

-----
What I fould really obnoxious is that for some test sessions in April 2000,
some VEC's had problems when the FCC changed their submission formats slightly
(because of the rules change) and some April sessions didn't have results show
up until mid-June 2000. It is possible that some 20wpm extras didn't have
their licenses issued until AFTER April 18th and by date are indistinguishable
from what some in this group called "extra lite."

And what I find obnoxious is that some people here continue to make
the distinction.