View Single Post
  #92   Report Post  
Old September 5th 03, 05:50 AM
Bob Brock
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 04 Sep 2003 01:29:46 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote:

That's a reasonable approximation ... and growing by leaps and bounds
daily with the Petition and associated publicity.

Carl - wk3c


Bull****, Prove it.


See, I told you guys that this would happen if any number was claimed.
Now, someone wants proof and the only way to proove it is to publish a
list of members which NCI won't do. It was like watching two trains
going opposite directions on the same track, you guys knew it was
going to happen, yet you did everything possible to make it happen.

The question then becomes, why? One possibility is that you thought
that a number could be published and no one would say, "Proove it."
We all know better than that though. Another possiblity was that it's
what you wanted to happen, because when it did happen you could all
jump on the "the number is BS bandwagon". The advantage of the "BS
bandwagon" is that it moves you away from just how untenable the code
requriement position really is and it makes you feel somehow stronger.

I'm sure that there are other reasons that you guys were so adamant
about wanting a number that you knew you would disagree with. I'd
like to hear them. What are they?