"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ...
.. . . .
However, Dick and other Morse fanatics insist that those modes aren't
a suitable option because they (dread the thought) require a computer
Modes which require a computer to run 'em cut both ways. Having to use
a computer to run the stuff represents a huge increase in station
complexity and the inevitable corresponding decrease in station
reliability. Additionally cost, weight, space, power consumption,
required technical skills and a bunch of other factors also mitigate
against the use of computer-based modes.
Given the mythical average ham who could care less about weak-signal
performances and/or throughput rates. Very few of which show up around
here, least of all in this discussion. So in this sense Dick is right.
(and some hardware/software that I'm sure "Shannon doesn't mean squat
Dick" couldn't even begin to understand).
Carl - wk3c
w3rv
|