View Single Post
  #115   Report Post  
Old September 5th 03, 05:04 PM
Brian Kelly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ...
.. . . .

However, Dick and other Morse fanatics insist that those modes aren't
a suitable option because they (dread the thought) require a computer


Modes which require a computer to run 'em cut both ways. Having to use
a computer to run the stuff represents a huge increase in station
complexity and the inevitable corresponding decrease in station
reliability. Additionally cost, weight, space, power consumption,
required technical skills and a bunch of other factors also mitigate
against the use of computer-based modes.

Given the mythical average ham who could care less about weak-signal
performances and/or throughput rates. Very few of which show up around
here, least of all in this discussion. So in this sense Dick is right.


(and some hardware/software that I'm sure "Shannon doesn't mean squat
Dick" couldn't even begin to understand).

Carl - wk3c


w3rv