RadioBanter - View Single Post

September 9th 03, 01:20 PM

(Brian Kelly) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Brian) writes:

(N2EY) wrote in message
.com...
The following isn't exactly a new idea, but some may not have seen it
yet...

Maybe the way out of the mess is for a Smith Chart test to replace
the code test.

So you still want the Amateur Radio Service to be the exclusive domain
of the Electrical Engineer's?

Nope. One does not have to be an EE in order to understand, and use, the Smith
Chart. Many hams who are not EEs have Smithc Chart knowledge and skill. Many
EEs do not.

Name ONE school that teaches Smith Charts that is not an Engineering school.

Just ONE!

The ARRL Antenna Book Collitch of Antenna Knowledge. Oops . .

Ooops is right. Now name one.

I
forgot about your "relationship" with antennas . . .

You still trying to get me to put up an antenna at your house?

btw, the plural of "Electrical Engineer" is "Electrical Engineers" not
"Electrical Engineer's". "Electrical Engineer's" is the possessive

So Electrical Engineers want to posess all of Amatuer Radio?

I don't think that's what the FCC wants, but since the NCVEC can do
any damned thing they want, go ahead and put it to them.

NCVEC could not create a separate Smith Chart test without FCC approval.

Bull****!

And
they could not deviate from multiple-choice format.

Bull****!

Then explain just why it's bull**** Brainiac.

NCVEC has shown that they can do anything they want.

It's obvious that irony is not one of your strong points, Brian.

It is obvious that NCVEC reality is not one of yours.