View Single Post
  #208   Report Post  
Old September 10th 03, 03:03 PM
Bob Brock
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:52:27 GMT, "charlesb"
wrote:


"Dick Carroll;" wrote in message
...

The point is, Why would anyone deliberately construct a 1/4 wave dipole?
Since they woiuldn't for obvious reasons, the fact that a dipole designed

for a
certain frequency just happens to be 1/4 wavelength at half that frequency

doesn't
automatically make it a 1/4 wave dipole. An antenna is what it was

designed to be, not
what some wag-troll declares.

Sure, anyone *could* construct a 1/4 wave dipole, if he was that ignorant.

No one does. So
there aren't any around.


Well now you've let the cat out of the bag, Dick. Somebody had convinced
this Troll to use a 1/4 wave dipole, and now here you go, letting them know
that they've been snookered.

They just couldn't understand why the radio kept frying its finals and they
never could seem to get a good signal out, even when the radio did work....
Now they know why! - And its all your fault!

Party pooper.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


What? Never heard of an antenna tuner?