"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"

writes:

Anyone who would forsake any communication venue
just doesn't have a clue for the value of that venue...

Kim W5TIT

Does this mean the fact that you forsake the Morse code communications
venue indicates that you "just don't have a clue for the value of that
venue"? (Your words, not mine.)

Sunuvagun!

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB




I just discovered this post, Hans. You have a better capability of
understanding than what is demonstrated above. I do not, and never have
forsaked CW communication. Perhaps you can give me an idea as to how I
caused you to think that?

And, please don't get confused with the *testing* requirement, which I
don't
like; and that I don't like using it. Just because someone doesn't see
its
merit as a testing element and just because I don't use the mode, does
not
mean I don't believe in its value. Every area where I have had any
influence in emergency communication has always included a venue for
*any*
form of radio communication, CW included; ATV included; etc.

Kim W5TIT

Kim:

For someone who has often characterized herself as an intelligent person,
you would appear to have a poor grasp of the meaning and usage of the
word "venue." A "venue" (n.) is a place, a locality, a location for
something
to take place. Your incorrect usage of this term would tend to indicate
an inclination toward prolixity. I suggest that you eschew obfuscation
and select less egregiously irrelevant verbiage, lest you be accused
of circumlocution.

73 de Larry, K3LT



Don't bother with TWIT Larry. She probably 'blocked' you too... hi.

Dan/W4NTI