Dick Carroll wrote:

JJ wrote:


Some claimed there is no such thing as a 1/4 wave
dipole, I simply stated there is, I never made any claims it would be a good
antenna.


Ok. Since it was me who said there is no such thing as a 1/4 wave dipole, I'll
modify my statement to read "There is no such thing as a 1/4 wave dipole other
than at the station of a clueless ham who knows no better".

That should take care of it.

Probably not!

I think this thread should be forwarded to the F.C.C. as an example of
why the testing requirement might be at a bit too low of a level right
now. 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -