I never named anyone as the porcupine's - uh - quills. I assumed that
you know who you are, and, well.....apparently, I was correct.

Kindly do not include Arnie in that category by referring to 'us' when
you speak to him about it, though - ....he sure ain't one!

Why must I take a side in the code debate? Or does your ISP carry
this group as rec.radio.amateur.morsecode?

It's a policy group. For amateur radio. All policies. Not just the
one you like! It's a big world out there, 'lil feller.....

Pray for a clue, please - it would be a service to the entire Amateur
community. Pray to Saint Anderson, the Patron Saint of Lids...before
its too late....

That was humour too, Clint. You can go to bed now.

73, Leo

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 21:12:24 -0500, "Clint" rattlehead at computron
dot net wrote:


I find Leo's posts to be quite humorous, cogent, and factual. He runs
circles around you and Len. That's why you can offer nothing of substance
in return.

Arnie -
KT4ST


And how is it he's debating us when he also claims that he's not on
one side OR the other of the issue of CW testing?? HMMM???????

Just HOW is it he has managed to find a way to eat his cake and have
it too when the rest of humanity in thousands of years have not been
able to solve that age old paradox? HMMM?????

And, as far as "cogent and factual", is that before or after he made
a reference to us being pricks?

Clint
KB5ZHT