On 29 Jan 2004 13:38:56 GMT, oUsama (Yuri Blanarovich)
wrote:

|So "reality" exists when the software gives you the answer you expect:
|http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/current.htm
|but is useless otherwise?
|
|Maybe more like answer that reflects reality?
|
|You trust it to analyze linear conductors
|and inductive stubs that have inductance and capacitance per unit
|length but conclude that it is flawed when the conductor is coiled up
|a bit. Interesting.
|
|Isn't it interesting that loading stubs and coils, having the same inductance
|do the same amount of shortening of the wip, same effect, but when modeling
|programs model it, they show different current distribution? Funny logic?
|
|
|What about coax choke used at the antenna feedpoint? Have not heard "reason"
|for different RF current at both ends. It chokes, doesn't it? Huh?


Sorry, I've taken all of the jabs at this tarbaby that I care to. I
spent a lot of time preparing the paper that I published and it
"reflects reality" as I see it, until proven otherwise.

I would think that the pair of you would give a Howard Dean,
Yeeeeaaaaa! yell and claim that my findings proved your point that the
current is different at the two ends of the loading coil. Go figure.

Wes