But, Alter Kocker, the points that I make are lucid and cogent.
Something that you seem incapable of achieving.

Unkike the drivel and vitriol that you contunally post. And, if you
cannot attack someone personally, you are impotent. Out of ammo.
Powerless. Where is it written that only comments from people that you
can find in QRZ or in a phone book are valid? A Vue Shtet
Geschreiber, Len?

You are not a Ham. Your opinions don't matter here. Game over. And,
who is to say that you are who you say you are? And would you be any
more real than the disembodied voice of idiocy in the newsgroup that
you are right now? Not likely. Who knows? Who cares.

As Descartes said, "I think, therefore I am". (You won't find him on
QRZ either :0 ) In this newsgroup, I'm as real as you are. Anytime
you wish, you can find me here. And, if you wish to attempt an
intelligent discussion some day, look no further.

And in honour of your fondness of Yiddish, I leave you with this wish:

Er Zol Vaksen Vi a Tsibeleh, Mit Dem Kop in Drerd.

And soon.

30, Leo









On 26 Sep 2003 18:29:57 GMT, (Len Over 21) wrote:

In article , "Clint" rattlehead at
computron dot net writes:

I find Leo's posts to be quite humorous, cogent, and factual. He runs
circles around you and Len. That's why you can offer nothing of substance
in return.

Arnie -
KT4ST

And how is it he's debating us when he also claims that he's not on
one side OR the other of the issue of CW testing?? HMMM???????

Just HOW is it he has managed to find a way to eat his cake and have
it too when the rest of humanity in thousands of years have not been
able to solve that age old paradox? HMMM?????

And, as far as "cogent and factual", is that before or after he made
a reference to us being pricks?

Arnie is defending his Ego Turf, Clint.

It's a fairly standard way he does it. Just another PCTA who can't get
along with NCTAs who do NOT worship his mighty macho morsemanship.

This "Leo" doesn't really exist as any sort of Man.

He (or she) has no real interest in any subjects. "Leo" is just playing
with people in a unique form of sociopathy brought out by the Internet's
anonymity. It's a juvenile form of harrassment but gives this person
much glee for getting away with it. By choosing the PCTA side, "Leo"
gets support and encouragement from the PCTA regulars in here.

"Leo" is only involved with bashing personalities. "Leo" doesn't care
about any debate, discussion, or argument on any subject. He or she
just likes to hide in anonymity of the Internet and work out his or her
frustrations of daily whatevers by bashing anyone he or she picks.

"Leo" feels secure in the Internet anonymity. He or she must get some
feeling of "power" by remaining unidentifiable, to be able to hit on
anyone. It isn't reasonable discourse on subjects. It is just a perverse
form of aggression, of getting back at anyone without being physically
hurt. It is that person's little fantasy world at work in the mind.

What is ugly about that sort of psychological perverseness is that it
reflects badly on the lofty, noble principles that ARRL keeps saying
about amateur radio. It is rule by a mild form of terrorism, of the very
"thugs" he (or she) complains "others" are doing.

"Leo" tries to project "power" with the inference that anyone disagreeing
with his writings will be subject to harrassment, humiliation, or constant
barrage of denigration. He (or she) is "powerful" yet without any power
except to drive everyone away in disgust or extreme irritation.

What I find mildly curious is that the PCTA regulars are all "on his side."
The PCTA like that for they are frustrated at the turn of events of recent
history that is against their particular cause. What the PCTA regulars
don't realize is that the syndrome of this "Leo" can just as easily turn
against Them if they do not condone his or her statements. :-)