Tdonaly wrote:
Absolutely correct. No analysis is complete without taking that into account.
I was hoping no one would bring that up, however, since I've
been having too much fun goring Cecil's rather fragile ox.

Don't you mean Kraus' "rather fragile ox"?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----