Tdonaly wrote:

Cecil wrote,
Better yet, Cecil, show me a mathematical analysis. It doesn't have to
be rigorous - you can wave your hands if you want to - but it does have
to make sense. Ah, how wonderfully easy it would be if only your ideas were
true.

They are not my ideas, Tom. They come directly from page 824 of _Antennas_
For_All_Applications_, by Kraus and Marhefka, 3rd edition. Rather than me
wasting my time proving to you that Kraus is correct, how about you proving
that Kraus is wrong?

Or better yet - take the Diamond NR72B and prove that the phase-reversing
coil doesn't work on 70 cm. Maybe you can sue Diamond for fraud.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----