In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...

I have always presented well-reasoned, factual, and unemotional
arguments in support of code testing.


*Cough* WHAT?????!!!!! Sure, Larry. That is why you are so endeared by
many in this newsgroup, alone. Sure.

Why, Kim, I thought you were ignoring me because I don't post anything
here worthy of your response. Where did I go wrong this time?

Please don't hold me up to
the same light as those who may have transgressed in the manner
which you refer to above.

PHULEEZE. You are the *BEACON* to those whom Carl depicted, Larry! Forget
about being held up to any light. You *ARE* the light.

Sorry, Kim, not me. Jesus is the "light."

Above all, please remember that by far,
the largest portion of the QRM in the code/no-code debate has been
from the NCTA side. Also remember that as one who has never
used the Morse/CW mode to an extent which would have allowed
you to gain useful proficiency in the mode, you are not qualified to
judge the value of this mode at all. I'm not sitting here trying to
argue technical topics with you, so don't you try to tell me that the
Morse/CW mode and testing aren't of value to the ARS. We are
not on each other's respective levels of expertise. Since I'm
more than willing to respect your technical expertise, don't presume
to challenge my qualifications to make judgments about CW and
code testing, because you don't know what your talking about.

73 de Larry, K3LT


And, you obviously think that what you just said, above, is well-reasoned,
factual, and unemotional??!! I've broken my own rule and just responded to
a post from you that was none of the above.

Well, Kim, please feel free to go back to following your "rule." In fact, I
must insist that you do. I wouldn't want you to do anything that would
cause you any inconvenience.

73 de Larry, K3LT