Bill Sohl wrote:
"Dick Carroll" wrote in message
...
Bill Sohl wrote:
Dwight:
Because of that, few who oppose code testing, and even fewer
Technicians,
attend that club's meetings or socialize with the members. Find me a
survey
that is truly unbiased and I'll be glad to discuss the results. Until
then,discussing the results of surveys is simply a waste of time.
N2EY:
Then consider the comments to the restructuring NPRM.
I agree...surveys, votes, etc hold little sway with the FCC anyway.
So you think Bill Cross is obfuscating when he says that FCC wants the
ham community to decide what our rules are to be, for us to reach a
concensus??
Not at all, but I also believe that when it is obvious to the FCC that
a rule change is appropriate...even if a majority of hams oppose
that change...the FCC will do what it believes is right and in the
public interest. 98-143 serves as a bellweather to that since, if
most hams favored 5wpm General and 12 wpm Extra, the FCC
didn't buy it.
Bill, while you like to bring out this argument when discussing
Elimination of Morse code, I'd like to suggest you imagine some
situation where something you like about the ARS is going away.
Now assume that someone brings up the same point, that is:
I also believe that when it is obvious to the FCC thata rule change is
appropriate...even if a majority of hams oppose
that change...the FCC will do what it believes is right and in the
public interest.
I'll bet you would interpret that a invitation by the poster for you to
go away and kee quiet!
Perhaps we should use those words for say... BPL? Ad a few words to the
beginning, and:
NO QUOTE of yours, just an example here
As regards to the FCC approving the nationwide deployment of BPL, I also
believe that when it is obvious to the FCC that a rule change is
appropriate...even if a majority of hams oppose that change...the FCC
will do what it believes is right and in the public interest.
I'm trying to say that while a truism, it isn't necessarily a good
argument. See what I mean?
- Mike KB3EIA -
|