| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Harrison wrote:
For the foregoing reasons, it is wrong to say a single radio frequency has anything to do with "two different EM radiations coming out from a dipole". Richard, I think maybe he was referring to the MOM method of dividing a wire up into 'n' segments and assuming each segment is a small individual radiator. The radiation from each small radiator is vectorially summed with the radiation from all the other small radiators. Close to the radiators, the E and H fields can sum to being out of phase. If you change his "two different EM radiations" to "N different EM radiations", then what he is saying might be more understandable. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| basic question about radio waves | Antenna | |||
| Amateur Radio Legal Issues List | Antenna | |||